Skip to content

Governance

OASA starts founder-led and hands decisions to member councils as it grows.

Phase Trigger Who decides
1. Founder-led Now The founder, with member input
2. Advisory councils About 25 active members Councils advise; the founder has final say
3. Council-led About 100 members and multiple chapters Councils decide in their areas; the founder chairs Core and sets vision
  • Charter: purpose, principles and how decisions are made.
  • Bylaws: councils, voting, terms and amendments. The nonprofit needs bylaws and a board anyway.

Both are being drafted.

Each council has 3 to 7 people, drawn from Lead and Core members, with 1-year terms.

Council Responsible for
Core Direction, official projects, moonshots, Lead and Core promotions
Technical Standards, tech tree, architecture
Security Red team, security reviews, incident response, internal security
Chapters Chapter rules, new chapters, makerspace partnerships
Academy Courses, training, badges, school outreach
Size Process
Small The project lead decides
Medium A council or lead decides, and posts it publicly
Large (new standard, moonshot, rule change) OASA Proposal
Foundational (charter, core principles) Proposal plus two-thirds of Core
  1. A Builder or above writes the proposal.
  2. It stays open for discussion for about two weeks.
  3. The council votes by simple majority.
  4. The decision and the reasons are published.

In later phases the founder keeps a veto on changes to the core principles (encrypted always, decentralized, open by default and the rest), so the mission can’t drift.

  • The nonprofit board holds legal and financial responsibility. It stays small.
  • The company (OASA Engineering) has separate ownership and leadership.
  • A conflict-of-interest policy applies to anyone in both, and major agreements are disclosed.